In this invited competition, the following shortlisted firms will participate in a public presentation of their designs on December 1, 2023; Venue: DDP Art Hall 2
Participating Architects (Listed alphabetically):
• Hyunjoon Yoo (Yoo Hyunjoon Architects)
• Im Jaeyong (OCA Architects) • Minseok Cho (Mass Study Architects) • Jacques Herzog(Herzog
Read more…
Sponsor: Saint-Gobain Isover Type: International, open 2024 site location: Helsinki Eligibility: Architecture/engineering students in years 1-6 (Participants represent the university and the country where they are studying at the time of the competition) Fee: none Language: English Timetable: 29 March 2024 – Registration deadline 26 April 2024 – submission
Read more…
Aerial view of Tallinn with designated competition site
Sponsor: Real estate developer Elon OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia Type: International, invited, two-stage (second stage is competition) Location: Tallinn, Estonia Language: English Timetable Submission: November 13, 2023 Registration: November 13, 2023 Participants (4-6) selected: November 27, 2023
Process: The portfolio will
Read more…
Sponsor/Contracting Authority: Municipality of Trnava, Slovakia Type: Open, one-stage Services: Architecture, landscape architecture, planning Eligibility: EU./EWR Fees: none Languages: Czech, Slovak, English (all documentation) Timetable: 28 November 2023 – Deadline for submission of proposals or requests to participate Awards: 1st place – €24 000 2nd place – €18 000 3rd place – €12 000
Read more…
View toward Turku coastline and site
Sponsor: City of Turku, Finland Type: International, open, one-stage Eligibility: At least one member of a team must be licensed to practice in their country of residence Fee: none Languages: Finnish, English Timetable: 16 January 2024 – Submission deadline for documents Jury • Minna Arve,
Read more…
Sponsors: mGAP – Montclair Gateway to Aging in Place (501 (c) (3); AARP and the Partners for Health Foundation Competition manager: AIAS NJIT Freedom by Design Type: open to students currently at academic institutions in the Northeast AIAS Quadrant Eligibility: Undergraduate and Graduate Students eligible Fee: $30 Language: English Timetable: September 20, 2023 –
Read more…
2023 Theme: CARE
Architecture provides a primary form of care to our bodies. It is integral to our health, and therefore allows us to exist on this planet. The act of building defines our relationship with the ecosystem to which we belong. To our peril, and in many ways, architecture has become a
Read more…
Competition facilitator: Seoul Metropolitan Government Future Space Planning Division Urban Space Planning Officer Type: International, open, two-stage Languages: English, Korean Eligibility: Team should have licensed architect Fee: None Timetable: 28 August 2023 – Competition launch 14 September 2023 – Registration deadline 5 September 2023 – Q&A deadline 26 September 2023
Read more…
Housing for Displaced Refugees in Nigeria
Sponsors: Young Architects Competitions (YAC) and UN Migration Agency Type: International, student, one-stage Language(s): English, Italian Fees and timeline: 5 August 2023 – Early Bird registration ends ($25/team) August 6-September 9 – Standard Registration ($75/team) 12 September 2023 – Materials Submission deadline Awards: 1st Prize – €5,000
Read more…
School competition site
Administrator: Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism of Montenegro Type: International, open, one-stage Fee: none Languages: English, Montenegrin Eligibility: Teams must consist of at least one licensed architect in their country of origin Timetable: 10 June 2023 – Was end of Q&A period Important: Ten pages of the
Read more…
|
San Jose’s Urban Confluence Winner Cancelled
This week we received the news that the winning design for San Jose’s Urban Confluence competition by SMAR Architecture Studio has been cancelled. This comes after the original competition site was abandoned in favor of one more centrally located in downtown San Jose, Plaza de César Chávez. We can only assume that even this wasn’t enough to generate enough interest from major donors. From the very beginning of the competition, it appeared that the enthusiasm of those sponsoring the competition might be lacking links to potential donors with deep pockets—the hi-tech firms in Silicon Valley. After the competition resulted in a design that certainly entailed a major budget, the project had to be in trouble. The competition did produce a remarkable design; but this turned out to be another case where a competition, intended to generate enough public interest to fund a major project, came up short. -Ed
“A Museum for All”
Winning entry by Weiss/Manfredi Landscape Architecture and Urbanism
Background
The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art’s slogan “Creating a Museum for All” certainly reflects the efforts of many art museums to counter the notion that art museums exist primarily to cater to an elitist few. But one should note that this competition for an expansion of the museum’s capacity to serve a wider audience saw an initial step in this direction with the 1999 competition resulting in the Steven Holl addition, a series of pavilions stretching down one side of the large lawn area..
Read more…
Preparation and Organization of Design Competitions
[phase 1] Benjamin Hossbach / Christian Lehmhaus / Christine Eichelmann
210 × 230 mm, 192 pp.
over 600 images
softcover
ISBN 978-3-86922-316-2 (English)
ISBN 978-3-86922-240-0 (German)
Dom Publishers
€48 in EU (For price abroad, see below)
Founded in 1998 in Berlin, Phase 1 has been a principal player in the organization and facilitation of design competitions, not only in Germany, but abroad as well. The accomplishments of the firm have been well documented in three volumes—The Architecture of Competitions—beginning in 2i006. Whereas these books mainly focused on the results of the competitions they have administered, the present work, Fundamentals of Competition Management, takes one from the very beginnings of the competition process to its conclusion. The authors envisioned the publication as “three three books in one: one „blue book“ with example projects, one „yellow book“ with statements and the „white book“ with the actual guideline to competition management.”
Although there have been a number of handbooks covering the administration of designcompetitions a study covering the entire process in such detail is a welcome addition to the the literature in this field. As a contribution to this important democratic process that has yielded exceptional design for decades, this volume is not only valid for Europe, but a current overview of the process for those globally who wish to raise the level of design by virtue of a design competition. -Ed
Foreign institutions wishing to obtain a copy of the book will recieve a discount to cover the cost of foreign shipping.
To obtain a copy for that offer, go to: accounting@phase1.de
Since the recent realization of SMAR Architecture’s winning design we have now received images from a professional photo shoot. As an open competition for one of the more important projects in Europe at the time, we feel that full documentation of the process from start to finish was an important page in the history of architecture in the early 21st century. Documentation by us during the 2017 competition, with images from all finalists from the 144 entries is available at:
/competitions-static/2020/11/science-island-design-competition-finalists/
See more images…
Completed IMEX by Tuck Hinton Architects. Photo courtesy Anecdote
It is not often that we look back to a competition that occurred three decades ago that was also covered in detail by COMPETITIONS (Vol. 4, #4; pp. 14-27). What made the Chattanooga IMAX different back in 1994 was that the article covering that competition was authored by Prof. Marleen Davis, then Dean of the University of Tennessee’s School of Architecture and a member of the jury panel. This was not just a short article, covering the high points of the competition with a few talking points about the winning design. This 4,000+ word document also described in detail the jury’s observations about all the finalists, including the honorable mentions—one of the few times we have gained such a detailed glimpse in this country from the inside of the competition process.
Read more…
Winning entry by Luca Poian Forms Image ©Filippo Bolognese images
Good design seldom happens in a vacuum. And so it was with an international competition for a new mosque in Preston, U.K. A mid-sized city of 95,000, and located in Lancashire near the west coast and almost equally distant from London and Glasgow, Preston has a storied past, going all the way back to the Romans and the late Middle Ages, where it was the site of significant battles. During the Industrial Revolution, the city prospered, and it was not until after World War II that Preston experienced the British version of the U.S. Rust Belt. In the meantime, the city has experienced an upswing in economic activity, with an unemployment rate of only 3%. Aside from the appearance of new industries, the city has benefitted from the establishment of Central Lancashire University (CLU), which employs over 3,000 faculty and staff, and, as such, is one of the regions major employers. Any new university requires new facilities, and one of the most outstanding examples of this at CLU was the new Student Centre and Plaza, a result of a 2016 RIBA-sponsored competition won by Hawkins/Brown
Read More
Changdong Station winner – image ©D & B Partners Architects
Whereas international competitions for real projects have become a rarity lately, Korea is a welcome exception. Among the plethora of competition announcements we receive almost weekly, several have ended with foreign firms as winners. But the history of welcoming international participants does go back several years. One notable early example was the Incheon Airport competition, won by Fentress Bradburn Architects (1962-70).
Among the more recent successes of foreign firms was the Busan Opera House competition, won by Snøhetta (2013-) and the Sejong Museum Gardens competition, won by Office OU, Toronto (2016-2023).
Read more…
1st Place: Zaha Hadid Architects – night view from river – Render by Negativ
Arriving to board a ferry boat or cruise ship used to be a rather mundane experience. If you had luggage, you might be able to drop it off upon boarding, assuming that the boarding operation was sophisticated enough. In any case, the arrival experience was nothing to look forward to. I recall boarding the SS United States for a trip to Europe in the late 1950s. Arriving at the pier in New York, the only thought any traveler had was to board that ocean liner as soon as possible, find one’s cabin, and start exploring. If you were in New York City and arriving early, a nearby restaurant or cafe would be your best bet while passing time before boarding.
Read more…
|
